Retrotec USACE User Manual
Page 79
Chapter 7 57
To arrive at that systematization, we have to defi ne each single step with
respect to
Stock data
■
Measured data
■
Performance metrics/evaluation techniques
■
Outcomes/aims of the step
■
Table 2 gives an overview of the details of the four-step procedure. Details
are given in the Work Package 3 (edited by C. Neumann) report of the IEE
project Building EQ (“Building EQ: Tools and methods for linking EPBD and
continuous commissioning,” at www.buildingeq-online.net).
TABLE 2. OVERVIEW OF THE FOUR-STEP PROCEDURE.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Simple Benchmark
Certifi cation +
data acquisition
FDD + Optimization
Regular Inspection
Description
Gather basic consump-
tion and stock data
and fi rst classifi cation
/ baseline of the build-
ing performance
Certifi cation
according to
national imple-
mentation of
the EPBD
Analysis of the building per-
formance, identifi cation and
implementation of energy
conservation measures, and
optimization of performance
Maintain optimized
performance by
ongoing (minimal)
monitoring
Stock data
Minimal building de-
scription
Depending on
national imple-
mentation
Additional stock data ac-
cording to individual needs
No additional stock
data needed
Measured data
Utility bills/own me-
ter readings (yearly/
monthly)
Minimal data
set according to
Workpaper WP3
Additional measurements
according to individual
needs
Reduce to
minimum
Performance metrics
evaluation techniques
Benchmarks/signa-
tures
Depending on
national imple-
mentation
Evaluation: visualization,
statistical analysis, model-
based approaches
Metrics: to be developed
Energy consump-
tion as major
metric
Further actions
None
Installation of
data acquisition
(hourly data)
Implementation of energy
conservation measures
None
Outcomes
First classifi cation +
baseline (y/m)
Certifi cate
Theoretical
benchmark (AR)
Hourly data
available
Faultless/optimized operation
Energy conservation mea-
sures introduced
Documentation of energy
savings
Persistence of
energy-effi cient
performance