6 control loop theory – INFICON XTC/3 Thin Film Deposition Controller Operating Manual User Manual
Page 205

8 - 9
PN
07
4-
44
6-
P1
J
XTC/3 Operating Manual
8.1.6 Control Loop Theory
The instrumental advances in measurement speed, precision and reliability would 
not be complete without a means of translating this improved information into 
improved process control. For a deposition process, this means keeping the 
deposition rate as close as possible to the desired rate. The purpose of a control 
loop is to take the information flow from the measurement system and to make 
power corrections that are appropriate to the characteristics of the particular 
evaporation source. When properly operating, the control system translates small 
errors in the controlled parameter, or rate, into the appropriate corrections in the 
manipulated parameter, power. The controller’s ability to quickly and accurately 
measure and then react appropriately to the small changes keeps the process from 
deviating very far from the set point. 
The controller model most commonly chosen, for converting error into action is 
called PID. In the PID, P stands for proportional, I stands for integral and D stands 
for derivative action. Certain aspects of this model will be examined in detail a little 
further on. The responsiveness of an evaporation source can be found by 
repetitively observing the system response to a disturbance under a particular set 
of controller settings. After observing the response, improved controller parameters 
are estimated and then tried again until satisfactory control is obtained. Control, 
when it is finally optimized, essentially matches the parameters of the controller 
model to the characteristics of the evaporation source. 
Techniques for calculating optimum source control parameters can be classified by 
the type of data used for tuning. They fall into basically three categories:
Closed Loop Methods
Open Loop Methods
Frequency Response Methods
Of these categories, the open loop methods are considered superior. They are 
considered superior because of the ease with which the necessary experimental 
data can be obtained and because of the elimination (to a large extent) of trial and 
error when the technique is applied. The important response characteristics are 
determined as shown in 
.
In general, it is not possible to characterize all processes exactly; some 
approximation must be applied. The most common is to assume that the dynamic 
characteristics of the process can be represented by a first-order lag plus a dead 
time. The Laplace transform for this model (conversion to the s domain) is 
approximated as:
[5]
Output
Input
------------------
K
p
L
– s
exp
T
1
s 1
+
-------------------------------
=
