beautypg.com

Comparison of all tpc modes, 3 comparison of all tpc modes, Tpc m – Comtech EF Data CIM-300L User Manual

Page 128

background image

CiM-300L IP Enabled Satellite Modem

Rev. 1

FEC & Turbo

CD/CIM300L.IOM

102

6.3.3 C

OMPARISON OF ALL

TPC M

ODES

Mode

Eb/No at
BER = 10-6

Eb/No at
BER = 10-8

Spectral
Efficiency

Symbol
Rate

Occupied *
Bandwidth
for 1 Mbps
Carrier

QPSK Rate 1/2 Viterbi *

6.0 dB

7.2 dB

1.00 bps/Hz

1.0 x bit rate

1190 kHz

BPSK Rate 21/44 Turbo

3.0 dB

3.3 dB

0.48 bps/Hz

2.1 x bit rate

2493 kHz

BPSK Rate 5/16 Turbo

< 4.0 dB

< 4.0 dB

0.31 bps/Hz

3.2 x bit rate

3808 kHz

{O}QPSK Rate 1/2 Turbo

3.0 dB

3.5 dB

1.00 bps/Hz

1.0 x bit rate

1190 kHz

{O}QPSK Rate 3/4 Turbo

3.9 dB

4.3 dB

1.50 bps/Hz

0.67 x bit rate 793 kHz

8PSK Rate 2/3 TCM **
and RS (IESS-310)

6.1 dB

6.6 dB

1.82 bps/Hz

0.56 x bit rate 666 kHz

8PSK Rate 3/4 Turbo

7.0 dB

8.0 dB

2.25 bps/Hz

0.44 x bit rate 529 kHz

*

The occupied bandwidth is defined at the width of the transmitted spectrum taken at the -10
dB points on the plot of power spectral density. This equates to 1.19 x symbol rate for the
CiM-300L transmit filtering.

**

Included for comparative purposes.

It can be seen that the 8PSK Rate 3/4 Turbo performance closely approaches that of the
Rate 2/3 TCM/Reed-Solomon case – the BER performance is within approximately 0.4
dB. However, it should be noted that the Rate 3/4 Turbo mode is 20% more bandwidth
efficient
than the TCM case. The additional advantages of Turbo (lower delay,
performance during fades etc) should also be considered.