H3C Technologies H3C S7500E Series Switches User Manual
Page 331
6-106
[PE2-bgp] quit
You should see that among the routes advertised by PE 2 to CE 2, the AS_PATH of 100.1.1.1/32 has
changed from 100 600 to 100 100:
*0.13498737 PE2 RM/7/RMDEBUG:
BGP.vpn1: Send UPDATE to 10.2.1.1 for following destinations :
Origin : Incomplete
AS Path : 100 100
Next Hop : 10.2.1.2
100.1.1.1/32
Display again the routing information that CE 2 receives and the routing table:
Total Number of Routes: 5
BGP Local router ID is 10.2.1.1
Status codes: * - valid, > - best, d - damped,
h - history, i - internal, s - suppressed, S - Stale
Origin : i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network NextHop MED LocPrf PrefVal Path/Ogn
*> 10.1.1.0/24 10.2.1.2 0 100?
*> 10.1.1.1/32 10.2.1.2 0 100?
* 10.2.1.0/24 10.2.1.2 0 0 100?
* 10.2.1.1/32 10.2.1.2 0 0 100?
*> 100.1.1.1/32 10.2.1.2 0 100 100?
Routing Tables: Public
Destinations : 9 Routes : 9
Destination/Mask Proto Pre Cost NextHop Interface
10.1.1.0/24 BGP 255 0 10.2.1.2 Vlan12
10.1.1.1/32 BGP 255 0 10.2.1.2 Vlan12
10.2.1.0/24 Direct 0 0 10.2.1.1 Vlan12
10.2.1.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
10.2.1.2/32 Direct 0 0 10.2.1.2 Vlan12
100.1.1.1/32 BGP 255 0 10.2.1.2 Vlan12
127.0.0.0/8 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
200.1.1.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
After configuring BGP AS substitution on PE 1 too, the VLAN interfaces of CE 1 and CE 2 should be
able to ping each other:
PING 200.1.1.1: 56 data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
Reply from 200.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=253 time=109 ms
Reply from 200.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=253 time=67 ms
Reply from 200.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=253 time=66 ms
Reply from 200.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=253 time=85 ms
Reply from 200.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=253 time=70 ms
--- 200.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 66/79/109 ms