beautypg.com

Ethernet clocking versus sonet/sdh clocking, Figure 20-11, Illustr – Cisco 15327 User Manual

Page 343

background image

20-11

Ethernet Card Software Feature and Configuration Guide, R7.2

Chapter 20 POS on ONS Ethernet Cards

Ethernet Clocking Versus SONET/SDH Clocking

Figure 20-11

ML-Series Card Framing and Encapsulation Options

Ethernet Clocking Versus SONET/SDH Clocking

Ethernet clocking is asynchronous. IEEE 802.3 clock tolerance allows some links in a network to be as
much as 200 ppm (parts or bits per million) slower than other links (0.02%). A traffic stream sourced at
line rate on one link may traverse other links which are 0.02% slower. A fast source clock, or slow
intermediate clocks, may limit the end-to-end throughput to only 99.98% of the source link rate.

Traditionally, Ethernet is a shared media that is under utilized except for brief bursts which may combine
from multiple devices to exceed line-rate at an aggregation point. Due to this utilization model, the
asynchronous clocking of Ethernet has been acceptable. Some Service Providers accustomed to loss-less
TDM transport may find the 99.98% throughput guarantee of Ethernet surprising.

Clocking enhancements on ONS Ethernet cards, excluding the E-Series cards, ensure Ethernet transmit
rates that are at worst 50 ppm slower than the fastest compliant source clock, ensuring a worst-case
clocking loss of 50 ppm - a 99.995% throughput guarantee. In many cases, the card’s clock will be faster
than the source traffic clock, and line-rate traffic transport will have zero loss. Actual results will depend
on clock variation of the traffic source transmitter.

SONET/SDH Frame

SONET/SDH Payload Envelope

Transport Overhead

LEX

PPP

Cisco HDLC

HDLC Framing Mode

GFP-F Framing Mode

Flag

Address Control Protocol

Payload

FCS

BCP

or

Encapsulation

GFP-F Frame Types

115448

GFP-Mapped

Ethernet (LEX)

GFP-PPP GFP-BCP

GFP-Cisco HDLC

Core

Header

Payload

Header

Payload

FCS