beautypg.com

Det-Tronics EQP Fire and Gas Detection/Releasing System SAFETY MANUAL User Manual

Page 8

background image

5.1

95-8599

6

EQP Safety Controller Diagnostic Checks
The EQP Safety Controller automatically carries out a

number of diagnostic checks on a continuous basis. A

number of other diagnostic tests are also conducted

to ensure the integrity of the EQPSL communication

network and proper operation of the user’s logic

program.

All checks conducted by the Controller are completed at

least once an hour. This period is called the diagnostic

test interval.

Note

other devices have different diagnostic test
intervals. See eQP Safety Device Diagnostics. Be
sure to account for this in calculations.

The certifying authority that has granted the Det-Tronics

EQP Safety System approval for use in low demand

SIL 2 safety-related applications has confirmed the

completeness of the diagnostic tests. The user program

requires no additional on-line diagnostic tests. Proof

testing, which is the responsibility of the user, is

discussed in the “Proof Testing” section of this manual.

Redundant EQP Safety Controllers
Using Det-Tronics EQP Safety Controllers in redundant

mode will increase their availability, but will have no

effect on their ability to perform a safety-related function.

The redundant controller system is certified for use as

part of a SIL 2 system.

When a second Controller is added for redundancy, the

firmware versions must match. Controllers configured

for redundant operation operate in either Master or

Standby mode. Refer to the EQP system manual

(number 95-8533) for more details regarding controller

redundancy set-up.

Note

Both the master and standby controllers must be
SIL rated models. If a SIL rated controller is paired
with a standard controller model, a redundancy
fault will be indicated.

EQP SAfETY DEVICES
EQP Safety rated field devices share many of the same

attributes as standard EQP devices. They have the same

physical form factor and are connected to the system in

the same manner as standard devices. However, SIL

versions of field devices are not directly interchangeable

with the standard versions. Each version has a unique

ID. Each field device must be configured for the

proper type of device or a trouble is annunciated. SIL

rated devices differ from the standard modules in that

they perform additional software diagnostic checks

specifically designed for safety-related applications. SIL

rated Controllers and EDIOs have red labels for easy

identification. A mixture of SIL and non-SIL rated field

devices can be used on the system at the same time,

however, non-SIL rated devices shall not block or inhibit

the safety function in user logic.

Self-detected failures of the diagnostics will result in

a fault state where the condition is reported to the

controller and annunciated to the user. Depending on

the type of fault, the field device may restart and attempt

to re-establish communication with the controller.

EQPSL
The EQP controller and associated field devices are

connected via the EQPSL communication loop. Only

EQP system approved devices can be connected to

EQPSL network (closed network). Devices from other

manufacturers shall not be connected to the EQPSL.

Special test pattern messages are periodically sent end

to end on the EQPSL to detect faults in the transceivers

and memory buffers.

Extensive diagnostics are implemented in the EQPSL

to detect degraded conditions and ensure that reliable

communications are available when needed to respond

to a demand. This is especially important as Fire and

Gas systems are traditionally energize to trip and it is,

therefore, unacceptable for them to trip based on loss of

power or network communications.

The EQPSL physical network topology is limited to a

single loop which starts and ends at the Controller. The

system is automatically configured to utilize less than

50% of the available bandwidth in normal operation.

The additional bandwidth may be utilized by the system

in transient situations involving heavy message traffic.

Safety communications were evaluated in terms of

probability of failure on demand consistent with an IEC

61508 low demand application.