Guralp Systems ART User Manual
Page 58
ART
magnitude, Miscellaneous Paper S-71-1, Report 16, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi. Not seen.
Ozbey, C., Sari, A., Manuel, L., Erdik, M., & Fahjan, Y. (2004),
An empirical attenuation relationship for northwestern Turkey
ground motion using a random effects approach. Soil Dynamics
and Earthquake Engineering, 24, 115–125.
PEER Strong Motion Database (2002), http://peer.berkeley.edu/
smcat/data.html.
Rathje, E.M., Faraj, F., Russell, S., & Bray, J.D. (2004),
Empirical
relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake
ground motions, Earthquake Spectra, 20(1), 119-144.
Sabetta, F., & Pugliese, A. (1996),
Estimation of response
spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground
motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,
86(2), 337–352.
Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J. A., Makdisi, F., & Youngs, R. R.
(1997),
Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal
earthquakes based on California strong motion data.
Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 180–189.
Sarma, S. K. (1971),
Energy flux of strong earthquakes,
Tectonophysics, 11, 159-173.
Sarma, S. K. & Yang, K. S. (1987),
An evaluation of strong
motion records and a new parameter A95, Earthquake
Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 15(1), 119-132.
Shakal, A. F. & Huang, M. J. (1985),
Standard tape format for
CSMIP strong-motion data tapes, California Strong Motion
Instrumentation Program, Report OSMS 85-03.
Sokolov, V. & Furumura, T. (2008),
Comparative analysis of two
methods for instrumental intensity estimations using the
database accumulated during recent large earthquakes in
Japan, Earthquake Spectra, 24(2), 513-532.
Spudich, P., Joyner, W. B., Lindh, A. G., Boore, D. M., Margaris,
B. M., & Fletcher, J. B. (1999), SEA99:
A revised ground motion
prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(5), 1156–
1170.
58
Issue C