beautypg.com

Table 61 comparison of eap authentication types, Wpa(2), Encryption – ZyXEL Communications NBG-415N User Manual

Page 136

background image

ZyXEL NBG-415N User’s Guide

Appendix B Wireless LANs

136

For added security, certificate-based authentications (EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS and PEAP) use
dynamic keys for data encryption. They are often deployed in corporate environments, but for
public deployment, a simple user name and password pair is more practical. The following
table is a comparison of the features of authentication types.

WPA(2)

Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) is a subset of the IEEE 802.11i standard. WPA2 (IEEE
802.11i) is a wireless security standard that defines stronger encryption, authentication and
key management than WPA.

Key differences between WPA(2) and WEP are improved data encryption and user
authentication.

Encryption

Both WPA and WPA2 improve data encryption by using Temporal Key Integrity Protocol
(TKIP), Message Integrity Check (MIC) and IEEE 802.1x. In addition to TKIP, WPA2 also
uses Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) in the Counter mode with Cipher block chaining
Message authentication code Protocol (CCMP) to offer stronger encryption.

Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) uses 128-bit keys that are dynamically generated and
distributed by the authentication server. It includes a per-packet key mixing function, a
Message Integrity Check (MIC) named Michael, an extended initialization vector (IV) with
sequencing rules, and a re-keying mechanism.

TKIP regularly changes and rotates the encryption keys so that the same encryption key is
never used twice. The RADIUS server distributes a Pairwise Master Key (PMK) key to the AP
that then sets up a key hierarchy and management system, using the pair-wise key to
dynamically generate unique data encryption keys to encrypt every data packet that is
wirelessly communicated between the AP and the wireless clients. This all happens in the
background automatically.

WPA2 AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is a block cipher that uses a 256-bit
mathematical algorithm called Rijndael.

Table 61 Comparison of EAP Authentication Types

EAP-MD5

EAP-TLS

EAP-TTLS

PEAP

LEAP

Mutual Authentication

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Certificate – Client

No

Yes

Optional

Optional

No

Certificate – Server

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Dynamic Key Exchange

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Credential Integrity

None

Strong

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Deployment Difficulty

Easy

Hard

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Client Identity Protection

No

No

Yes

Yes

No