beautypg.com

Connection possibilities of the sensors (sil) – JUMO 701150 14597 safetyM STB/STW - Safety Temperature Limiter and Safety Temperature Monitor Data Sheet User Manual

Page 11

background image

Page 11/14

Data Sheet 701150

2012-07-01/00540116

JUMO GmbH & Co. KG
Delivery address: Mackenrodtstraße 14

36039 Fulda, Germany

Postal address:

36035 Fulda, Germany

Phone:

+49 661 6003-0

Fax:

+49 661 6003-607

E-mail:

[email protected]

Internet:

www.jumo.net

JUMO Instrument Co. Ltd.
JUMO House
Temple Bank, Riverway
Harlow, Essex CM20 2DY, UK
Phone: +44 1279 635533
Fax:

+44 1279 635262

E-mail:

[email protected]

Internet: www.jumo.co.uk

JUMO Process Control, Inc.
8 Technology Boulevard
Canastota, NY 13032, USA
Phone: 315-697-5866

1-800-554-JUMO

Fax:

315-697-5867

E-mail:

[email protected]

Internet: www.jumousa.com

Connection possibilities of the sensors (SIL)

The JUMO safetyM STB/STW 701150 evaluation device structure is basically identical. Various possibilities to connect the sensors are available.
These possibilities are listed in the following table along with the achievable SIL level:

Note:

Variants 1 to 4 were evaluated with JUMO probes according to data sheets 901006 and 902006. For variant 5 no sensor system was taken into
account. In this case, the user selects the sensor system. For this reason, the user is responsible for evaluating the achievable SIL.
If the used SIL-capable sensor consists of hardware and software (e.g. transmitter), the maximum SIL that can be achieved —irrespective of the
architecture—is the one according to which the sensor software was developed (so, for example, if the sensor software has SIL 2, the max.
achievable SIL is 2).
The possibility to connect passive sensors such as double thermocouples, Pt100, or Pt1000 sensors means that the sensors do not necessarily
require a SIL qualification. In this case, the specification of the failure rates for the passive sensors is sufficient for the SIL qualification of the
overall system. The user of the system must always determine the PFD

avg

and/or PFH value of the overall safety circuit to evaluate the achieved

SIL.

Failure rates and SFF for 70.1150...23 (AC 240 V)

Failure rates and SFF for 70.1150...25 (AC/DC 24 V)

Note:

Variants 1 to 4 were evaluated with JUMO probes according to data sheets 901006 and 902006.

For variant 5 no sensor system was taken into account.

In this case, the user selects the sensor system.
The PFH and PFD

avg

values were calculated assuming that the time to restore the system is 8 h (MTTR = 72 h). Furthermore, the calculation was based on a lifetime

of 10 years (T

1

= 10 y). The Common Cause Factor was determined according to the tables of DIN EN 61508 for sensor systems and logic.

Variant

Connected sensors

Sensor system archi-
tecture

Logics archi-
tecture

Achievable SIL

1

1 × Pt100 in 2-wire circuit

individual sensor

1oo1

1oo2D

SIL2

1a

2x Pt100/1000 2-wire circuit

1oo2

1oo2D

SIL3

2

2x Pt100/1000 3-wire circuit

1oo2

1oo2D

SIL3

3

2x thermocouple

1oo2

1oo2D

SIL3

4

1x Pt100/1000

2-wire and 3-wire circuit

1x thermocouple

1oo2

1oo2D

SIL3

5

STB/STW 70.1150 without

sensor system 1oo2D archi-

tecture

no probe or use 4 to 20 mA

(means that the sensor is not

taken into account for the cal-

culation).

Sensors connected by

the system user

Architecture acc. to con-

nection 1oo1 or 1oo2

1oo2D

SIL of the used sensor

(HW only)

Max. achievable SIL of

the system with 1oo1

sensor system architec-

ture

Max. achievable SIL of

the system with 1oo2

sensor system archi-

tecture

SIL1

SIL1

SIL2

SIL2

SIL2

SIL3

SIL3

SIL3

SIL3

Variant

λ

s

[Fit]

λ

dd

[Fit]

λ

dd

[Fit]

SFF

PFH (1/h)

PFD

avg

1

865.21

306.24

32.31

96 %

4.56 e

-9

2.02 e

-4

1a

865.21

306.24

32.31

96 %

1.05 e

-9

4.57 e

-5

2

868.17

303.28

32.31

96 %

1.05 e

-9

4.57 e

-5

3

881.62

326.78

33.62

96 %

1.03 e

-9

4.49 e

-5

4

887.68

343.82

35.52

96 %

1.22 e

-9

5.30 e

-5

5

881.02

313.43

35.57

96 %

1.04 e

-9

4.48 e

-5

Variant

λ

s

[Fit]

λ

dd

[Fit]

λ

dd

[Fit]

SFF

PFH (1/h)

PFD

avg

1

799.3

306.32

33.61

96 %

6.59 e

-9

2.91 e

-4

1a

799.3

306.32

33.61

96 %

3.07 e

-9

1.35 e

-4

2

802.26

303.36

33.61

96 %

3.07 e

-9

1.35 e

-4

3

827.25

324.71

37.91

96 %

3.13 e

-9

1.37 e

-4

4

833.31

341.75

39.81

96 %

3.23 e

-9

1.41 e

-4

5

818.96

323.07

36.26

96 %

3.05 e

-9

1.33 e

-4