Commonly used concepts, Controllability and observability grammians, Commonly used concepts -7 – National Instruments NI MATRIXx Xmath User Manual
Page 14: Controllability and observability grammians -7
Chapter 1
Introduction
© National Instruments Corporation
1-7
•
An inequality or bound is tight if it can be met in practice, for example
is tight because the inequality becomes an equality for x = 1. Again,
if F(j
ω) denotes the Fourier transform of some
, the
Heisenberg inequality states,
and the bound is tight since it is attained for f(t) = exp + (–kt
2
).
Commonly Used Concepts
This section outlines some frequently used standard concepts.
Controllability and Observability Grammians
Suppose that G(s) = D + C(sI–A)
–1
B is a transfer-function matrix with
Re
λ
i
(A)<0. Then there exist symmetric matrices P, Q defined by:
PA
′ + AP = –BB′
QA + A
′Q = –C′C
These are termed the controllability and observability grammians of the
realization defined by {A,B,C,D}. (Sometimes in the code, WC is used for
P and WO for Q.) They have a number of properties:
•
P
≥ 0, with P > 0 if and only if [A,B] is controllable, Q ≥ 0 with Q > 0
if and only if [A,C] is observable.
•
and
•
With vec P denoting the column vector formed by stacking column 1
of P on column 2 on column 3, and so on, and
⊗ denoting Kronecker
product
•
The controllability grammian can be thought of as measuring the
difficulty of controlling a system. More specifically, if the system is in
the zero state initially, the minimum energy (as measured by the L
2
norm of u) required to bring it to the state x
0
is x
0
P
–1
x
0
; so small
eigenvalues of P correspond to systems that are difficult to control,
while zero eigenvalues correspond to uncontrollable systems.
1
x x
–
0
≤
log
+
f t
( ) L
2
∈
f t
( )
2
dt
∫
t
2
∫
f t
( )
2
dt
1 2
⁄
ω
2
∫
F j
ω
( )
2
d
ω
1 2
⁄
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
π
≤
P
e
At
BB
′e
A
′t
dt
0
∞
∫
=
Q
e
A
′t
C
′Ce
At
dt
0
∞
∫
=
I
A A
I
⊗
+
⊗
[
]vecP
vec(
–
BB
′ )
=