beautypg.com

System design – Grizzly G0442 User Manual

Page 35

background image

Model g0442/g0601 (Mfg since 3/12)

-33-

system design

decide Who Will design

For most small-to-medium sized shops, you can
design and build the dust collection system your-
self without hiring engineers or consultants. We
have included some basic information here to get
you started on a basic design.

if you have a large shop or plan to design a com-
plicated system, we recommend doing additional
research beyond this manual or seeking the help
of an expert.

Dust

Collector

figure 45. Basic sketch of shop layout.

sketch your shop layout

When designing a successful dust collection sys-
tem, planning is the most important step. in this
step, sketch a basic layout of your shop, including
space requirements of different machines.

Before you get out your pencil and paper, we rec-
ommend you visit our Free Workshop Planner
available on our website at

www.grizzly.com.

our Workshop Planner will allow you to quickly
and easily design and print a basic shop layout.
don't worry, non-grizzly brand machines can be
substituted with grizzly machines for layout pur-
poses.

note: After you're finished, make sure to

save your layout for later modification.

your sketch only needs the basic details of the
shop layout, similar to the

figure below, includ-

ing all your current/planned machines and your
planned placement of the dust collector.

figure 47. inefficient duct layout.

BAD

Dust

Collector

figure 46. efficient duct layout.

Main

Line Duct

Branch

Line

Ducts

GOOD

Dust

Collector

sketch a basic duct layout

For the next step, sketch how you will connect
your machines to the dust collector. Consider
these general guidelines for an efficient system:

1. Machines that produce the most saw dust

should be placed nearest to the dust collector
(i.e. planers and sanders).

2. ideally, you should design the duct system

to have the shortest possible main line and
secondary branch ducts. see the

figures

below for ideas of efficient versus inefficient
duct layouts.