beautypg.com

Technical notes, Grounding and shielding, Ifb channel crosstalk – Studio Technologies 220 2013 User Manual

Page 30

background image

Issue 5, February 2013

Model 220 User Guide

Page 30

Studio Technologies, Inc.

Technical Notes

Grounding and Shielding

As previously discussed in this user guide,

the pin 1 connections on the main and

talkback outputs’ 3-pin male XLR connec-

tors are “floating,” i.e., not connected to

anything within the Model 220’s enclosure.

Some audio experts might take offense to

this, grousing that this should have been

left to the user or installer to be connected

or disconnected as desired. However,

repeated field testing found that floating

pin 1 on the outputs was the key to main-

taining quiet audio. From Fenway Park

in Boston, to the Orange Bowl in Miami,

and then northwest to Husker Stadium in

Nebraska, lifting pin 1 did the trick.
A simple solution is available if an applica-

tion does require that a ground be avail-

able on the main and talkback outputs’

interconnecting cables. All Model 220 XLR

connectors have a ground connection

that is made to the interfacing connector’s

metal “shell.” And most XLR connectors

have a pin or connection point available

to access its metal shell. By connecting

the cable shield to the mating connector’s

shell terminal, the common connection

typically found on audio interconnections

is created.

IFB Channel Crosstalk

By the very nature of its design, a stan-

dard “wet” IFB circuit is prone to exhibit

crosstalk between its two audio channels.

This occurs because the audio paths are

unbalanced (“single-ended”) and typically

transported on a single shielded twisted-

pair audio cable. The primary cause of

the crosstalk is the capacitance between

the wires in the cable pair. The greater the

capacitance, due to cable type and length,

the more crosstalk there will be. It’s not

surprising to find in sports broadcasting

venues that audio from one channel in an

IFB circuit can be heard “bleeding” into

the other channel. Does this generally cre-

ate a problem? No, as each channel in an

IFB circuit generally carries related audio

content. For example, on-air talent hearing

in their left ear a small amount of program

audio from channel 2 while an interrupt

from channel 1 is active, typically wouldn’t

perceive this as an issue.
There are several ways of reducing IFB

channel crosstalk. Probably the easiest

way is to use cable pairs that are not twist-

ed. Twisted pairs are great for differential

(balanced) signals, but not so great for

unbalanced transmission. This is gener-

ally because the more twists in a pair the

greater the effective cable capacitance.

In a stadium or arena setting, choosing

standard “telco” pairs may actually work

better than “high-performance” audio or

data cable!
Another option is to use two cable pairs

for each IFB circuit. If the pairs are not

shielded the wiring is simple. Common

would be connected to one side of each

pair, and then signal from each channel

would connect to the other side of the

pairs. If the pairs also contain shields the

wiring could be done somewhat differ-

ently. One option is to connect common

to both cable shields, IFB channel 1 (DC

with audio) to one full pair, and IFB chan-

nel 2 to the second full pair. A better op-

tion might be to have common connect to

both shields and one side of the pair that

serves IFB channel 2.
Other options are available if an applica-

tion demands low crosstalk. If resources

in the broadcast or production facility

allow one method would be to run the