Use of error detectors and limit, Detectors while pressurizing – MTS Model 286-30 Pore Pressure Intensifier User Manual
Page 27

Pore Pressure System Operation Considerations
286.30 Pressure Intensifier
Operation
27
Use of Error Detectors and Limit Detectors While Pressurizing
“Effects of Thermal Expansion of Pore Fluid”
describes two situations in which pore pressure can be, or can become, an 
uncontrolled variable. These situations, and actually all “normal” pressurizing 
procedures, warrant the use of whatever devices are available, on the electronic 
controller equipment, that enable system conditions to be monitored and system 
operation to be shut down in the event abnormal or undesirable operating 
conditions occur.
In the first situation, the controller is controlling pressure but becomes unable to 
compensate for additional pressure increase caused by further thermal expansion 
if the piston of the pressure intensifier bottoms out and cannot retract any further. 
In this case, two monitoring circuits, common to most controllers, would afford 
some protection, if properly pre-adjusted. 
Error detectors
Error detectors monitor the amplitude of the controller’s error signal (which is 
proportional to the difference between command and feedback) and are therefore 
always associated with the controlled variable. In the situation where the 
controller becomes unable to compensate for further thermal expansion (because 
the pressure intensifier is unable to retract any further), the error signal will begin 
to increase in magnitude as soon as the controller can no longer compensate, if 
further thermal expansion occurs. If the error detectors had been adjusted to be 
sensitive to small error levels, the pressurization process would be terminated 
very soon after the problem occurred.
Limit detectors
Limit detectors can be set up to monitor the level of variables, whether the 
variables are independent (controlled) or dependent (uncontrolled). In the first 
situation, 
Thermal expansion when operating in pressure control mode
controller’s limit detector could also have been set up to terminate the 
pressurization procedure in the event that pressure exceeded some pre-
established limit. With both error detectors and limit detectors in use monitoring 
the controlled variable, the pressurization procedure would be terminated by 
whichever detector reacted first.
In the second situation,
Thermal expansion when operating in displacement
, with volumetric displacement the controlled variable, the error
detector could be adjusted to react to some unusual level of error (associated with 
the controlled variable, volumetric displacement) and the limit detector could be 
set up to actuate if the dependent variable, pressure, exceeded some undesired or 
unanticipated level.
Because an unanticipated high pressure level is nearly always of greater concern 
than is high volumetric displacement, pressure should always be monitored by 
either limit detectors or error detectors. Limit detectors provide some advantage 
over error detectors in that precise limit levels are easily established. Error 
detectors actuate when feedback (the actual level of the controlled variable) 
deviates from command (the desired level of the controlled variable) by some 
presettable amount and can detect such errors regardless of the level of the 
controlled variable. Both detector types offer unique advantages and should be 
used simultaneously and judiciously according to the test situation at hand.
