beautypg.com

Liebert services – Emerson Liebert Power Solutions User Manual

Page 42

background image

42

Liebert Services

Complete Start-Up And Preventive Maintenance Services

Peace of mind. It’s confidence you’ve done everything

possible to assure system uptime. It’s confidence the power

systems you rely on are operating at peak performance. It’s

confidence you’ve selected the best partner available to bring

you back online in the event of unexpected downtime.

Complete confidence. When it comes to selecting a

service organization to maintain your critical power

systems, you can only have complete confidence that

Emerson Network Power Liebert Services can deliver:

Real uptime assurance. We have the proprietary

tools, industry knowledge and robust service

infrastructure to deliver real assurance that your

systems will be available when you need them.

Efficient downtime recovery. After all, if downtime

strikes, you need a partner that can get you back

online quickly with intelligent answers, rapid service

response and parts where and when you need them.

Confident Customers. Satisfied Customers.

You know them. They’re confident because they

know their systems will be available when they

need them. So, they’re satisfied customers—and,

they’re probably ours. 99% of our customers are

satisfied with the service we provide. In fact, 96% of

them would recommend us to someone else

(source: MRSI).

Proprietary Tools Deliver Uptime

Ensuring peak operating performance of your

equipment comes down to having knowledgeable

Field Technicians in your facility with the most

current tools available to do the job. Only Emerson

Network Power Field Technicians have access to the

proprietary tools needed to ensure system uptime—

firmware upgrades, factory engineering

specifications, access to Liebert product and

application engineers and R&D. No one else can

bring this to your organization.

Regular OEM preventive maintenance increases the mean

time between failures (MTBF).

For instance, the mean time between failures for a system

that receives 1 annual PM is 10 times greater than a system

that receives 0 PMs.

By contrast, a system that receives 4 annual PMs, as

opposed to 0 PMs, increases its duration between failures

by 51 times.

1

Data is based on Mean Time Between Failure analysis for

three phase UPS systems (≥ 100kVA) with an Emerson

Network Power service agreement between 2002-2007.

The Business Case For Regular Maintenance

Number of Annual Preventive Maintenance Visits

Increase in

Mean Time

Between

Failures

1

60x Increase in MTBF

50x

40x

30x

20x

10x

0

1

2

3

4

51x

37x

23x

10x

1x