beautypg.com

U.s. fda – Siemens Mobile User Manual

Page 73

background image

©

Siem

ens AG

2003, M

:\Mobi

l\R

65

\CF62_TMO\en\sug\A65_

FDA.fm

73

U.S. FDA

VAR Langua

ge: en; V

A

R issue

date: 040413

left page (73)

of CF62 Leopard TMO SUG us, A31008-H6050-A40-1-4A19 (02.06.2004, 16:08)

U.S. FDA

The U.S. Food and Drug Admin-

istration's (FDA) Center for

Devices and Radiological Health

Consumer Update on Mobile

Phones

FDA has been receiving inquiries

about the safety of mobile phones,

including cellular phones and PCS

phones. The following summarizes

what is know – and what remains

unknown – about whether these

products can pose a hazard to

health, and what can be done to

minimize any potential risk. This

information may be used to respond

to questions.
Why the concern?
Mobile phones emit low levels of

radio frequency energy (i.e., radio

frequency radiation) in the micro-

wave range while being used. They

also emit very low levels of radio fre-

quency energy (RF), considered non-

significant, when in the stand-by

mode. It is well known that high lev-

els of RF can produce biological dam-

age through heating effects (this is

how your microwave oven is able to

cook food). However, it is not known

whether, to what extent, or through

what mechanism, lower levels of RF

might cause adverse health effects

as well. Although some research has

been done to address these ques-

tions, no clear picture of the biologi-

cal effects of this type of radiation

has emerged to date. Thus, the avail-

able science does not allow us to

conclude that mobile phones are

absolutely safe, or that they are

unsafe. However, the available sci-

entific evidence does not demon-

strate adverse health effects associ-

ated with the use of mobile phones.
What kinds of phones are in question?
Questions have been raised about

hand-held mobile phones, the kind

that have a built-in antenna that is

positioned close to the user's head

during normal telephone conversa-

tion. These types of mobile phones

are of concern because of the short

distance between the phone's

antenna – the primary source of the

RF – and the person's head. The

exposure to RF from mobile phones

in which the antenna is located at

greater distances from the user (on

the outside of a car, for example) is

drastically lower than that from

hand-held phones, because a per-

son's RF exposure decreases rapidly

with distance from the source. The

safety of so-called "cordless phones",

which have a base unit connected to

the telephone wiring in a house and

which operate at far lower power

levels and frequencies, has not been

questioned.