3B Scientific Anthropological Skull Model - KNM-ER 406, Omo L. 7a-125 - Manual (Page 3)

®
English
KNM-ER 406
Omo L. 7a-125
• Australopithecus boisei
• Paranthropus boisei
The model was developed from a cast of the replica from the collection of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe
University of Frankfurt am Main, Institute of Anthropology and Human Genetics for Biologists.
The catalog ID “KNM-ER” stands for “Kenya National Museum – East Rudolph; find number 406” and indi-
cates the site at Lake Kurkana, formerly Lake Rudolph. The calvarium, found by R. Leakey and H. Mutua in
1970, is approx. 1.7 million years old and one of the best preserved fossils of the “Nutcracker Man”. The
partial mandible Omo L.7a-125 added here originates from a different excavation site, but can be clearly
attributed to the same species.
This ID was originally assigned to skull find OH 5 and alludes to the strikingly strong and robust masticato- This ID was originally assigned to skull find OH 5 and alludes to the strikingly strong and robust masticato-
ry system which is characteristic of this species. It indicates a highly specialized diet of hard-fibred plants
ry system which is characteristic of this species. It indicates a highly specialized diet of hard-fibred plants
and kernels and influences the entire skull morphology. Massive masticatory muscles produced immense
and kernels and influences the entire skull morphology. Massive masticatory muscles produced immense
chewing pressure which acted on the substantially enlarged molars and premolars. The flaring zygomatic
chewing pressure which acted on the substantially enlarged molars and premolars. The flaring zygomatic chewing pressure which acted on the substantially enlarged molars and premolars. The flaring zygomatic chewing pressure which acted on the substantially enlarged molars and premolars. The flaring zygomatic
arches and the prominent sagittal crest as origin of the temporal muscle suggest how powerful this largest
arches and the prominent sagittal crest as origin of the temporal muscle suggest how powerful this largest arches and the prominent sagittal crest as origin of the temporal muscle suggest how powerful this largest arches and the prominent sagittal crest as origin of the temporal muscle suggest how powerful this largest
masticatory muscle was. A comparable sagittal crest can also be seen in male gorillas and sometimes in
masticatory muscle was. A comparable sagittal crest can also be seen in male gorillas and sometimes in masticatory muscle was. A comparable sagittal crest can also be seen in male gorillas and sometimes in masticatory muscle was. A comparable sagittal crest can also be seen in male gorillas and sometimes in
male orang-utans, although this is not an indication of a closer relationship. Rather, Nutcracker man clear-
male orang-utans, although this is not an indication of a closer relationship. Rather, Nutcracker man clear- male orang-utans, although this is not an indication of a closer relationship. Rather, Nutcracker man clear- male orang-utans, although this is not an indication of a closer relationship. Rather, Nutcracker man clear-
ly belongs to the hominine line, which separated at least 4-5 million years earlier from the line that led to
ly belongs to the hominine line, which separated at least 4-5 million years earlier from the line that led to ly belongs to the hominine line, which separated at least 4-5 million years earlier from the line that led to ly belongs to the hominine line, which separated at least 4-5 million years earlier from the line that led to ly belongs to the hominine line, which separated at least 4-5 million years earlier from the line that led to ® ®
today’s chimpanzees, which are most closely related to our own line. today’s chimpanzees, which are most closely related to our own line. today’s chimpanzees, which are most closely related to our own line. today’s chimpanzees, which are most closely related to our own line. today’s chimpanzees, which are most closely related to our own line.
The assignment to the Australopithecus species is not generally accepted. Some scientists consider it justi- The assignment to the Australopithecus species is not generally accepted. Some scientists consider it justi- The assignment to the Australopithecus species is not generally accepted. Some scientists consider it justi- The assignment to the Australopithecus species is not generally accepted. Some scientists consider it justi-
fied to distinguish the robust forms of the australopithecins – i.e. also the similar-looking Australopithecus
fied to distinguish the robust forms of the australopithecins – i.e. also the similar-looking Australopithecus fied to distinguish the robust forms of the australopithecins – i.e. also the similar-looking Australopithecus fied to distinguish the robust forms of the australopithecins – i.e. also the similar-looking Australopithecus
robustus from South Africa and the slightly older Australopithecus aethiopicus, of which few finds from
robustus from South Africa and the slightly older Australopithecus aethiopicus, of which few finds from robustus from South Africa and the slightly older Australopithecus aethiopicus, of which few finds from robustus from South Africa and the slightly older Australopithecus aethiopicus, of which few finds from
Eastern Africa and Malawi are known
Eastern Africa and Malawi are known – from the more delicate forms and give these the genus name
Paranthropus.
This precursor form of humans probably already used simple tools, e.g. excavation tools, for access to roots
or tubers. Whether they also were able to make simple stone tools is not clear, since they lived at the same
time as the earliest representatives of the Homo genus, which on their part were bearers of the oldest
stone-tool culture, the Oldowan culture. However, the cranial capacity of the first Homo representatives
exceeded that of the Nutcracker men by just over 100 cubic centimeters, for which capacities of 500 to
510 cubic centimeters were reconstructed. Assuming that the larger brain also had a slightly higher intelli-
gence, the “robusts” would seem rather unlikely as manufacturers of the tools.
On the other hand, it can be taken for certain that A. boisei became extinct 1-1.5 million years ago without
successors. Possibly, the extreme specialization of these precursor humans prevented them from reacting
flexibly to a changing environment.
Author: Stefan Flohr, member of staff at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University of Frankfurt am Main