GC EUROPE G-aenial - Manual (Page 25)

25
Overall evaluation G-ænial
3%
11%
84%
3%
9%
86%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Poor / Not good Average Good/ Excellent
G-ænial Anterior G-ænial Posterior
Overall evaluation G-ænial
compared to current composite
4%
10%
17%
39%
27%
4%
6%
23%
33%
31%
0%
20%
40%
Worse Slightly
worse
Same Slightly
better
Better
G-ænial Anterior G-ænial Posterior
Would you recommend G-ænial
to your colleagues?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
No Maybe Yes
G-ænial Posterior G-ænial Anterior
G-ænial Anterior & Posterior Technical Manual
7.3 Overall evaluation
approximately 85% of dentists
judged G-ænial as good to
excellent. Both the anterior and
Posterior version received excellent
ratings.
For G-ænial anterior, 69% of
dentists judged the material to be
slightly better and 27% better than
their current composite; for G-ænial
Posterior, 33% of dentists found it
to be slightly better and 31% better.
Only 10 to 14% rated it as slightly
worse to worse.
easier handling, colour match and
radiopacity were quoted as the
main reason for preferring G-ænial
to their current composite material
72% to 74% of dentists would
recommend G-ænial to their
colleagues for the characteristics
mentioned above, namely, the
excellent aesthetics, easy handling
and reliable end results.
Overall evaluation G-ænial
Overall evaluation G-ænial
compared to current composite
Would you recommend G-ænial
to your colleagues?