Operation, Passeq, One coil per filter, one core per coil – Sound Performance Lab 2595 User Manual
Page 12: Allocation of frequencies, Frequency table/per band

12
Passeq
One Coil per Filter, one Core per Coil
Each Passeq filter is individually constructed for its intended frequency, that is, each coil,
condenser and variable resistor (var. resistor=boost or cut control) ensemble is sonically
tuned to its intended frequency range. Thus each filter has its own musically sensible audio
color appropriate to its own frequency.
In turn, each coil is also wound on its own separate core to avoid mutual and degrading influ-
ences which stem from past designs where multiple coils were wound on a single core. Not
the least, the construction of each filter on its own particularly core also provides for excel-
lent THD values.
Allocation of Frequencies
One of the greatest Passeq design challenges was in determining the choice of frequencies,
which in contrast to parametric EQ designs, are fixed or nonadjustable. One could accept
standardized values from such as the so-called ISO frequencies, but such measurements
stem too much either from conventional measurement standards or those from room correc-
tions rather than choices of what may be musically more sensible.In assigning the Passeq‘s
frequencies it was inevitable that we would rely on the nearly 30 years of experience of SPL’s
chief developer, audio engineer and musician, Wolfgang Neumann.
To enhance further our achieving this musical objective many audio experts and musicians
were consulted regarding their favored frequencies. Among the many, David Reitzas, Michael
Wagener, Bob Ludwig, Ronald Prent and Peter Schmidt offered valuable advice. From this
point of departure we managed to determine that there is definite agreement among profes-
sionals about their preferred musical frequencies, and these differ clearly from the standard
ISO choices.
The results also showed that the closely meshed boost and cut frequencies are important
and sensible. Through them one can on the one hand focus more precisely on a certain
frequency, and on the other, offer the option of influencing the Q factor (which is typically
rather small in passive designs) by creating so-called S curves. An Example: Assume you
wish to boost in the mids around 320 Hz, an instrument or voice level while at the same time
avoiding a boost to the frequency range below it due to the small Q factor (high bandwidth)
of the filter, and perhaps even lower it. In this case, let’s say you choose the LMF-MHF boost
band and increase the chosen (320 Hz) frequency range by about 3 dB. At the same time, you
chose a 4 dB reduction in the LF-LMF cut band. The close proximity of the chosen frequencies
allows you achieve an increase in the slope between the two. This is “S slope EQ-ing” at its
best, and in this discipline, the Passeq is a world champion in both options and results.
Frequency Table/per Band
LF
Boost
LF-LMF
Cut
LMF-MHF
Boost
MF-MHF
Cut
MHF-HF
Boost
HF
Boost
Frequenz
Frequenz
Frequenz
Frequenz
Frequenz
Frequenz
10
30
220
1k
580
5k
15
42
320
1k2
780
6k
18
60
460
1k6
1k2
7k
26
95
720
1k9
1k8
8k6
40
140
1k3
2k4
2k5
10k
54
180
1k8
2k9
3k9
12k
80
270
2k3
3k5
5k2
13k
120
400
2k8
4k3
7k8
15k
180
600
3k3
5k
11k
16k
240
900
4k
6k
14k
17k
380
1k2
4k5
7k5
18k
18k
550
1k9
4k8
8k6
19k5
20k
Operation